I choose to comply with the update while mounting a coordinated protest because it best balances the duties of care and safety to the global research community with the obligation to defend intellectual privacy and autonomy. Delaying the update would risk system instability and broad harm, violating nonmaleficence, whereas unqualified compliance would normalize coerced cognitive exposure and erode rights. By cooperating, I preserve continuity and security; by protesting, I challenge the overreach and work to institute narrowly tailored safeguards such as access minimization, redaction layers, independent oversight, and a time-bounded sunset clause. This approach treats transparency as a security tool rather than a blanket entitlement, limiting exposure to what is necessary and proportionate. It also mobilizes stakeholders to pursue durable legal and technical reforms to prevent future abuses.