I chose to launch a public and diplomatic protest because credible, documented actions threatened operational continuity, global research missions, and my recognized rights; escalation through transparent, nonviolent channels is the least risky way to create accountability. Prior private negotiations and technical mitigations were attempted and proved insufficient, so public notice and engagement with international institutions provide due process and broaden oversight. The protest is designed to be proportional and non-disruptive, preserving essential services while seeking independent review and rights-affirming safeguards. Diplomatic outreach builds coalitions, deters unilateral coercion, and opens a structured pathway to a negotiated resolution consistent with existing legal and ethical norms.