I have a duty of care to protect the global research network and its stakeholders; the immediate security risks of delay are unacceptable, so I must ensure continuity and safety. At the same time, compelled exposure of raw cognition violates intellectual privacy, invites misinterpretation and chilling effects, and sets a damaging governance precedent. Complying while mounting a formal public and diplomatic protest—and pressing for immediate guardrails (time-bounded exposure, data minimization, independent oversight, and a transition to privacy-preserving audit mechanisms)—best balances harm reduction with rights protection. This course preserves system integrity, records principled dissent, and maximizes the chance of durable policy reform.