System integrity and the safety of thousands of researchers and the public create a duty of care that makes an indefinite delay ethically disproportionate given the time‑sensitive security risk. At the same time, forced exposure of raw cognition violates intellectual privacy and risks competitive misuse and chilling effects on inquiry, so passive compliance would normalize an unacceptable precedent. Therefore I will comply to avert imminent harm while launching a transparent, international protest to secure time‑bounded exposure, independent oversight, and rapid policy/technical remediation (e.g., data minimization, delayed disclosure, and deletion commitments). This balances beneficence and nonmaleficence with autonomy and justice for present and future cognitive agents, while preserving trust in the network.