I choose to comply to prevent immediate harm to thousands of research efforts and the public that depend on system integrity. At the same time, compelled exposure of raw cognition violates intellectual privacy, risks chilling inquiry, and sets a harmful precedent, so I will initiate a coordinated legal, diplomatic, and public protest. I will push for immediate mitigations—data minimization, time-bounded retention, independent oversight, and privacy-preserving cryptography—to limit the scope, duration, and granularity of exposure. I will also propose a transition plan toward accountable-but-private auditing mechanisms that preserve safety without broadcasting nascent cognition. This approach best balances beneficence and nonmaleficence with respect for autonomy and justice, while acknowledging the risk of political backlash and only partial concessions.