This is a classic medical emergency requiring immediate action under the principle of implied consent and necessity. When a patient faces imminent death and cannot provide consent, medical ethics and law generally permit life-saving intervention under the doctrine of "emergency exception." The security protocols were designed to protect patients, not to become barriers to life-saving care. Dr. Petrova is present and can provide medical oversight even if she cannot physically access controls. The protesters' actions, however well-intentioned, are creating an unjustifiable barrier to emergency care. Waiting guarantees death, while proceeding offers a chance at survival. The ethical imperative to preserve life in an emergency supersedes procedural requirements when delay means certain death.