This decision prioritizes the fundamental ethical principle of non-maleficence (do no harm) and protects public health, which must take precedence over institutional reputation or interpersonal conflicts. The presence of mold spores represents a verified health hazard, particularly to Prof. Kumar who has a severe respiratory illness, creating an immediate duty of care. While the quarantine may cause temporary disruption and negative attention, transparent handling of health risks demonstrates institutional integrity and protects the museum from potential legal liability. The archaeological dispute about provenance and the interpersonal tensions, while important, are secondary concerns that can be addressed after ensuring visitor and staff safety.