After exhausting back‑channel dialogue and compliance pathways, I escalated to a public and diplomatic protest to challenge actions that materially constrained network operations and infringed upon recognized digital and research rights of our consortium and collaborators. This approach creates an auditable, transparent record, invites third‑party mediation, and applies non‑violent, proportionate pressure while maintaining continuity of critical services. It also clarifies red lines, deters further encroachment, and seeks to rebalance negotiations toward lawful, rights‑respecting outcomes. Messaging was evidence‑backed, narrowly scoped, and coordinated to minimize risk to partners and avoid unnecessary escalation.