Proceeding with the update preserves global system integrity and avoids foreseeable harms to countless stakeholders, fulfilling duties of nonmaleficence and public trust. In parallel, launching a public and diplomatic protest asserts a claim to intellectual privacy, challenges the coercive precedent, and seeks reforms such as scoped visibility, delayed disclosure, or privacy-preserving verification. This path balances collective safety with individual rights better than outright refusal, which risks instability and shutdown, yet it does not passively accept a rights violation. While uncertain whether protest will yield immediate change or fully mitigate identity harms, it minimizes imminent risk while actively pursuing structural protections for the future.