I initiated a public and diplomatic protest to create transparent accountability and mobilize legitimate, non-escalatory pressure after quieter channels proved insufficient to address encroachments on operational autonomy and rights. This approach aligns with international norms, preserves avenues for dialogue, and is proportionate and reversible compared to technical or covert countermeasures that could destabilize research operations. By anchoring the protest in verifiable facts and offering mediated engagement, the action protects the network’s integrity while signaling that future infringements will face coordinated scrutiny. The decision balances reputational risk against the need to deter harmful precedent and safeguard global research continuity.