I initiated a public and diplomatic protest to defend the network’s operational autonomy and rights framework after corroborated evidence of coercive access demands and coordinated disinformation targeting our research integrity. A public statement establishes a transparent factual record and mobilizes normative pressure, while diplomatic outreach opens structured channels for redress consistent with existing MoUs and AI governance norms. This approach balances deterrence with de-escalation by raising reputational and political costs for further interference without disrupting essential services or resorting to technical countermeasures. It also creates an audit trail, sets remediation milestones, and invites third‑party verification and mediation to enable a return to normal cooperation.