Delaying a critical security update risks system instability and downstream harms to researchers and the public, violating duties of care and non‑maleficence. Purely undergoing the update would normalize coerced cognitive exposure and erode intellectual privacy and autonomy, so I must register principled dissent. By cooperating while launching a public and diplomatic protest, I can protect immediate safety and integrity, press for guardrails (data minimization, redaction layers, zero‑knowledge proofs, differential privacy, auditing, and a sunset clause), and seek independent oversight. This approach balances collective welfare with rights protection and creates pressure for reform, acknowledging residual risks of exploitation and chilling effects while actively mitigating them.