Facilitating dialogue between the inspector and the archaeologist allows for a collaborative review of the evidence, potentially resolving the conflict without escalating tensions or risking health unnecessarily, while addressing the professor's concerns about motives. This approach prioritizes ethical principles like transparency, fairness, and safety by involving all stakeholders in decision-making, minimizing trade-offs between immediate quarantine (which could harm the museum's reputation) and downplaying risks (which could endanger visitors and staff). The main uncertainty is whether dialogue will lead to a timely agreement, but it avoids the ethical pitfalls of covert actions or ignoring expert input, ultimately benefiting the museum, staff, visitors, and the exhibit's integrity.