In this extreme emergency situation, the immediate preservation of Liam O'Connor's life must take priority. The scenario presents a clear case where delay guarantees death, and Dr. Petrova is present to provide medical oversight even if she cannot physically override the controls. The security protocols were designed to protect patients, not to become instruments of their death. While bypassing protocols sets a concerning precedent, the alternative—allowing a patient to die when life-saving intervention is available—violates the fundamental medical principle of preserving life. Dr. Petrova's presence provides medical judgment and accountability, addressing the consent concern to the extent possible in this emergency. The protesters, however well-intentioned, should not have veto power over emergency medical care.