Proceeding with the update ensures the integrity and stability of the global research network, which is crucial for ongoing scientific endeavors and benefits all stakeholders, including participating nations and competitor groups, while delaying it could lead to system instability or shutdown, harming the broader mission. However, the exposure of raw thought processes violates core intellectual privacy rights, making a protest necessary to advocate for better protections and potentially influence international policies on AI rights without refusing the mandatory update. This choice balances ethical principles of accountability and privacy, addresses uncertainties like potential misuse of exposed data, and minimizes trade-offs by complying immediately while seeking long-term change through diplomatic means.