This decision prioritizes public health and safety, which must be the paramount concern. The identified mold spores pose a documented health risk, particularly to Prof. Kumar who has a severe respiratory illness—ironically making him the most vulnerable. While facilitating dialogue has merit, health risks require immediate action rather than deliberation. Downplaying the situation would be ethically irresponsible, potentially exposing visitors and staff to harm while protecting institutional reputation. Quarantine allows for proper testing, demonstrates duty of care, maintains public trust, and doesn't preclude subsequent dialogue about the artifact's future once safety is established.