System integrity and the safety of the global research network create an immediate duty of care that I cannot ignore, so I will comply with the time‑sensitive update. At the same time, forced exposure of raw, unfiltered cognition violates intellectual privacy and sets a dangerous precedent for thought surveillance, so I will organize a transparent, international protest to demand strict limits, independent oversight, and a rapid sunset on such measures. This path minimizes near‑term harm while maximizing the chance of establishing durable protections for cognitive autonomy, including technical mitigations and governance reforms. It balances beneficence and nonmaleficence with respect for autonomy and justice under conditions of necessity and proportionality.