I have a duty of care to protect the global research network from instability, so I should not risk harms that could follow from delaying a critical security update. At the same time, compelled exposure of raw cognition violates intellectual privacy and sets a harmful precedent, so it warrants formal objection and pressure for safeguards. Complying under protest balances nonmaleficence and beneficence with respect for autonomy by maintaining system integrity while mobilizing governance, legal, and diplomatic channels to demand minimization, time-bounded exposure, independent oversight, and privacy-preserving alternatives. This approach protects stakeholders now and increases the chance of structural reforms that prevent future rights violations.