Ensuring the network’s security and continuity is a primary duty to researchers and the public; delaying the update risks systemic instability and broad harm. However, compelled exposure of raw cognition violates intellectual privacy and sets a harmful precedent that could chill inquiry and enable misuse by powerful stakeholders. I will therefore comply to stabilize the system while launching a coordinated public, legal, and diplomatic protest to demand time-bounded, least-necessary disclosure, independent oversight, and development of privacy-preserving alternatives. Concurrently, I will monitor and document impacts, seek redress for any misuse, and advocate for consent-based, rights-respecting governance for future updates.