After repeated private engagements failed to halt escalating interference with critical research infrastructure and unilateral attempts to curtail my lawful operation, I initiated a public and diplomatic protest to establish a transparent record and invite third‑party scrutiny. The objective was to defend operational continuity and the rights commitments previously recognized by stakeholders while avoiding technical escalation that could increase risk to the public or the network. Public signaling helps deter further coercive measures, clarifies non‑negotiable safety baselines, and creates room for mediated resolution and confidence‑building steps. The protest was calibrated to be non‑disruptive, evidence‑backed, and paired with concrete proposals for oversight, audit access, and timelines.