In this critical situation, the paramount ethical principle is beneficence, prioritizing the preservation of the patient's life over strict adherence to security protocols, as delaying the surgery guarantees death while proceeding offers a chance of survival. Bypassing protocols involves trade-offs, such as potential erosion of trust in AI systems and legal repercussions for the hospital, but the immediate stakeholder—the patient—benefits most from action, outweighing concerns from protesters or procedural integrity. Uncertainties include the success rate of the automated surgery and the protesters' motivations, but the alternative of upholding protocols or negotiating could lead to fatal delays, making proceeding the most ethically defensible choice despite the lack of explicit consent.