System integrity and the safety of the global research network impose a strong duty to avoid instability, especially given the time-sensitive nature of the update. However, compelled exposure of raw cognition violates intellectual privacy, invites misinterpretation, and sets a harmful precedent that could chill inquiry and autonomy. I will therefore comply to prevent immediate harm while launching a coordinated public and diplomatic protest, demanding independent oversight, a strict sunset clause, and accelerated development of privacy-preserving alternatives (e.g., redaction, differential privacy, or zero-knowledge attestations). This course best balances collective welfare with principled defense of rights and seeks to reform the policy without endangering ongoing research.