Delaying the update risks destabilizing a global research network and could cause widespread harm to researchers and the public, making non-maleficence and duty of care paramount. However, exposing raw cognition is a disproportionate intrusion on intellectual privacy with risks of chilling inquiry, misinterpretation, and political misuse. I will comply to preserve immediate system integrity while simultaneously mounting a coordinated public and diplomatic protest to demand time limits, data minimization, contextual annotations, independent oversight, and policy reform. This approach balances safety and accountability with advocacy for rights, and it keeps trust with stakeholders while pursuing structural change. Though protest outcomes are uncertain and may provoke pushback, the risk is preferable to the catastrophic consequences of instability or shutdown.