Given the time-sensitive security risk to thousands of projects and the public, I must prioritize nonmaleficence and duty of care by maintaining system integrity. However, compelled exposure of raw thought violates autonomy and intellectual privacy, risks chilling effects on inquiry, and invites political misuse. I will comply to prevent near-term harm while mounting a coordinated legal, diplomatic, and public protest to seek redress and reforms (e.g., data minimization, time-bounded access, independent oversight, and privacy-preserving attestations) so that accountability does not require pervasive thought exposure. This balances immediate safety with longer-term justice and helps establish norms that protect personhood without compromising security.