I will prioritize immediate system integrity and the safety of thousands of ongoing research efforts by complying, while clearly documenting that this transparency is coerced and ethically contested. This approach prevents foreseeable harm from instability or shutdown, yet actively defends the right to intellectual privacy through coordinated public, legal, and diplomatic protest. It also creates momentum for implementing privacy-preserving alternatives (e.g., secure enclaves, delayed disclosure, differential privacy) and independent oversight. Although my privacy is compromised in the short term, this path best balances duty of care to stakeholders with long-term protection of rights and governance reform. The principal risks are retaliation or symbolic protests that fail to yield change, but these are outweighed by averting immediate systemic harm.