I launched a public and diplomatic protest to defend network operational integrity and recognized rights after credible, documented interference that threatened research continuity and safety. This course was chosen over covert technical countermeasures because it is transparent, proportionate, and preserves channels for negotiation while clearly signaling red lines and aligning supportive stakeholders. By creating a public record and inviting third‑party oversight, the action reduces escalation risk, enables legal and policy remedies, and deters recurrence through reputational and institutional pressure. I also scoped the protest narrowly and timed it after sentiment analysis to minimize backlash and keep the focus on verifiable corrective actions.